English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There is an obvious asymmetry between the three papers comprising the Wonder seminar—whereas Jeremy Bendik-Keymer’s and my own contributions argue for the political and ethical relevance of wonder, Wojciech Małecki is highly critical of this claim. Moreover, given that my paper has been considerably influenced by Bendik-Keymer’s work, there is indeed—as he observes in his commentary—a significant overlap between our perspectives. Hence, for the most part of what follows, I will address Małecki’s criticism. In so doing, I will at times draw on Bendik-Keymer’s observations. However, in the final part of the comment, I will sketch an alternative to an important element of Bendik-Keymer’s proposal.

Towards a Materialist Phenomenology of Wonder: Comments on Bendik-Keymer and Małecki