English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Based on the 17th century ideas of sovereignty of the people, modern parliamentary systems to a substantial degree consist of unicameral bodies. This trend, marked in the last half-century, is slowly displacing traditional bicameral bodies, according to Inter-ParliamentaryUnion statistics.Parliaments derived from the institution of royal councils have a rich history. It is reasonable to look for their origin in Icelandic Althing and medieval German conventions. The English traditional parliament became the model institution, showed the way to bodies composed of more than two chambers. In our age researchers attempt to discover the phenomenon in four types of bicameralism: the Nordic, federal, self-governmental chambers, and house of “prudence”. The author of the article tries to find an adequate solution to this problem in Polish conditions, taking on historic and comparative comparison, focusing on modern legislative actions.

Czy druga izba parlamentu jest potrzebna? Rozważania na temat bikameralizmu w ujęciu historyczno-komparatystycznym