English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The sovereignty of a country to issue a policy or regulation in the field of international trade   is limited by the enactment of the provisions in the World Trade Organization (WTO),   especially for countries that have ratified the GATT / WTO. If a country issues rules and/or   policy that conflict with WTO provisions, it will result in the country being sued by another   country. As happened with the policy issued by Australia. Indonesia is suing Australia to the   WTO for the rules and/or policies for the plain packaging of cigarette products (The Tobacco   Plain Packaging Act 2011) imposed by Australia. The policy is considered contrary to the   provisions of the WTO, specifically the provisions of TRIPS (Trade Related Aspects of   Intellectual Property Rights). This research utilizes a normative juridical method by paying   attention to legal materials such as legal principles, legal principles, international   conventions, and legislation relating to the problem of The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act.   From the results of the study can be seen WTO considerations in this case. In addition, there are also advantages and disadvantages of the implementation of The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act in the future.Keywords: WTO/GATT, The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act, International Economic Law    Abstrak    Kedaulatan suatu negara untuk mengeluarkan suatu kebijakan atau peraturan dalam bidang perdagangan internasional dibatasi oleh berlakunya ketentuan-ketentuan dalam   World Trade Organization   (WTO), terutama bagi negara-negara yang telah meratifikasi GATT/WTO. Apabila negara mengeluarkan aturan dan/atau kebijakan yang bertentangan dengan ketentuan WTO akan  mengakibatkan negara tersebut digugat oleh negara lain. Seperti yang terjadi dengan kebijakan yang dikeluarkan oleh Australia. Indonesia menggugat Australia ke WTO atas aturan dan/atau kebijakan kemasan polos produk rokok (  The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011  ) yang diberlakukan oleh Australia. Kebijakan tersebut dianggap bertentangan dengan ketentuan WTO, khususnya ketentuan TRIPS (  Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights  ). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan memperhatikan bahan hukum seperti asas-asas hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, konvensi internasional, serta perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan masalah   The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act  . Dari   hasil penelitian dapat terlihat pertimbangan WTO dalam kasus ini. Selain itu, terlihat juga keuntungan dan kekurangan dari pemberlakuan   The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act k  e depannya.Kata kunci: WTO/GATT,   The Tobacco Plain Packaging Act  , Hukum Ekonomi Internasional

law review

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEBIJAKAN PRODUK KEMASAN POLOS PRODUK ROKOK AUSTRALIA DALAM WTO [Resolution of the Dispute over Australia's Rules and Policies for the Plain Packaging of Cigarette Products in the WTO]