English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

R (on the application of Colonel Munjaz) v Mersey Care NHS Trust; S v Airedale NHS Trust Interested Parties: 1) Secretary of State for Health; 2) Mind [2003] EWCA Civ 1036 Court of Appeal (16th July 2003) Lord Phillips MR, Hale LJ, and Latham LJ This is the Court of Appeal decision in two cases which raised questions about the status of the Mental Health Act Code of Practice. Although both cases concerned the use of seclusion, the judgment is likely to have a significant impact on any matter covered by the Code. At first instance Stanley Burnton J and Sullivan J had each held that the Code was merely guidance to which Trusts should have regard but from which they could depart. Such departure would only be unlawful if it was Wednesbury unreasonable.

Judicial recognition of the status of the Code of Practice