English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This work proposes the analysis and interpretation of the main narrative procedures of the chronicles of Carlos Monsivais around the massacre of 1968, to then compare and contrast them, from their interdiscursive remissions with those of his colleague and contemporary Elena Poniatowska, and with other journalistic reports published by the main Mexican newspapers. The analysis of tones, strategies and writing grammars of Monsivais himself versus Poniatowska's discourse allows us to establish differences to verify different ways of exercising the urban chronicle. Likewise, we propose to problematize the position of the chroniclers in relation to the construction that the mass media made of the events and representations around 1968, and analyze the way in which each of them included the testimony of the witnesses.

The Killing of Tlatelolco: Comparing and Contrasting Carlos Monsiváis’s Chronicle with Elena Poniatowska’s Testimony and the Printed Media’s