English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The evaluation system of the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) requires Graduate Programs to constantly reflect about the recommended and achieved performances. Given the relevance of information to support planning, this article aims to identify new indicators and procedures that could contribute to improve the CAPES evaluation policies in Proposals three (students group, thesis and dissertations) and five (social insertion). it is a methodological study, elaborated from Monitoring and Evaluation (2007-2016), it applies Documentary Analysis and Bibliometrics/Scientiometrics indicators, having the Programa de Pos-Graduacao em Ciencias Biologicas: Bioquimica of UFRGS as a case study. The present study seeks: to analyze the performance of the PPG based on the guidelines from Biological Sciences II Field; to evaluate the nucleation of graduates in Higher Education Institutions; to identify corrective measures and to evaluate the impact and viability of the Ordinances (Portarias dos 8) that recommend a maximum of eight students per teacher for scientific production. To achieve the objectives, it applies three strategies and a new scientific indicator. The procedure improved the evaluation on the contributions of the  nucleation program and on the profile of the formation of graduates. The other procedure is related to management, which identifies the effects of the CAPES evaluation by corrective measures. the indicator co-authorship discente/docente points out the unfeasibility of Portarias dos 8 because it negatively impacts scientific production. The aforementioned strategies and the co-authorship indicator can be used as additional parameters for the CAPES evaluation, improving the Institutional Evaluation of other Programs.

Sistema de avaliação da CAPES: indicadores e procedimentos de monitoramento e avaliação de desempenho