English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The present study will show how, in Herodotus’ account of the Persian wars, proper names have a key narrative function and are also part of his method of historical exposition. Herodotus uses nomina loquentia to insert micro-narratives that affect the processes of meaning-making in the main story and, sometimes, even in the general historical account. After some considerations regarding the origins of philology in the Histories and the ways in which etymological wordplay is a prolongation and an addition to the historian’s philological activities, four cases of nomina loquentia will be presented in which names function as capsules of meaning that allow the historian to articulate and offer an interpretation of different contrasting narratives of a historical event.

Cuatro casos de etimología poética en Heródoto: Los nomina loquentia de Bato, Crío, Demarato y Cípselo