English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We describe 2 cases of electromagnetic interference (EMI) with a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Both patients were using DR-HO'S ® pain therapy system for chronic back pain (VGH Solutions Inc., Markham, ON, Canada). In both cases, EMI was inappropriately labeled as ventricular fibrillation. In the first case, the noise detected was of a short duration and did not fulfill the discriminator criteria to deliver ICD therapy. In the second case, inappropriate anti-tachycardia pacing and shocks resulting from EMI were delivered. Both patients were advised not to use TENS devices at home. Increased awareness of EMI resulting in inappropriate ICD therapies using these devices is needed.

Inappropriate Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillation Detection of Ventricular Fibrillation Induced by Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation