English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

An analysis study, Outcomes Associated with Extraction versus Capping and Abandoning Pacing and Defibrillator Leads, was designed to compare lead capping and abandonment versus extraction in Medicare patients without device infections and with pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing lead addition. It had been hypothesized that a cap-and-abandon strategy would be associated with lower short-term mortality, while lead extraction would be associated with better long-term outcomes.

Lead Management Decision-making: What Can We Learn from Outcomes Following Lead Extraction versus Capping?