English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Objectives. To examine the objectivity and reliability of the branch statistical reporting on the number of deaths and divergences of the final clinical and medico-legal diagnoses in the hospitals of the Moscow region. Material and methods. We have investigated materials of the Bureau of Forensic Medical Expertise of Moscow Region and data of the Federal statistical monitoring No 14 «Information on the activities of the inpatient care units’ in the Moscow region in 2018. It was the sampling inquiry. The causes of death were grouped by classes and nosologiсal entities of ICD-10. Research methods: documentary, statistical and analytical. Descriptive statistics of the absolute and relative values. Results. Significant differences between the data of Federal statistical monitoring No. 14 and the Bureau of Forensic Medical Expertise of Moscow Region were established both in the number of medico-legal examinations in relation to individual entities and in the number of established divergences of diagnoses. Conclusion. The form of Federal statistical monitoring No. 14 provides biased information in the section of information on cases subjected to forensic autopsy: input errors are 90 %.

sudebnaâ medicina

ASSESMENT OF THE RELIABILITY OF FEDERAL STATISTICAL MONITORING DATA ON THE NUMBER AND STRUCTURE OF DIVERGENCES IN THE FINAL CLINICAL AND MEDICO-LEGAL DIAGNOSES