English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In this study, antioxidant effects in vitro and in vivo by the Caenorhabditis elegans model of Auriculaia auricula polysaccharides (AAP1, AAP2 and AAP3) were used to compare these three kinds of polysaccharide extraction processes (hot water extraction, enzyme extraction and alkali extraction). And the monosaccharide composition of these polysaccharides was determined by Gas Chromatography (GC) method. Results suggested that AAP2, which was mainly composed of arabinose, D-xylose, 2-Deoxy-D-arabino-hexose, mannose, glucose and galactose with the molar ratio of 1:0.44:0.33:1.67:1:0.17, possessed stronger antioxidant activity. It could scavenge free radicals, up-regulation of antioxidant enzyme (superoxide dismutase (SOD) by 91.25% and catalase (CAT) by 36.67%, compared with control). It could also reduce the level of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in C. elegans under oxidative stress. In conclusion, enzyme extraction is better in preparing AAP.

advance journal of food science and technology/advance journal of food science and technology

Antioxidant Activity &lt;em&gt;in vitro&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;in vivo&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;em&gt;Auricularia auricula &lt;/em&gt; Polysaccharides through Different Extraction Processes