English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

IT WAS ONLY DECADES after the discovery of the manuscripts at Tunhuang y early in this century that their contents began to find their way, piece by piece, into historical studies of early Chinese Buddhism. In particular, they contain important information about the uncertainties surrounding the textual sources from the Sung period; about documented events surrounding the conflict between the Northern and Southern schools of Zen; about the origins of the Platform Sittra; and finally, about the development of the Northern school, from its roots in the East Mountain school to its demise during the tenth century. At the time I was working on my Zen Buddhism: A History, I was unable to take this information fully into consideration. In the meantime, Western scholars have produced a wealth of material, based on the work of Yanagida Seizan, which now permits me to append a condensed overview.1

Early Chinese Zen reexamined: A supplement to Zen Buddhism: A History