English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Should we correct our students’ language errors? Most ESL teachers would answer this question with a resounding Yes while at the same time wondering how to meet the challenge. The collaborative project reported below was designed to provide ESL teacher trainees with an opportunity to experience the ups and downs of providing corrective feedback on writing and develop their awareness in this regard. To this end, the teacher trainees acted as corrective-feedback tutors to high school learners during one school semester. During the course of the project, they kept journals documenting their reflections in regard to this demanding pedagogical practice. Time constraints, motivation, and fear of making mistakes themselves or of not providing adequate guidance to the learners were among the major hurdles encountered by the tutors. In interviews conducted at the end of the project, the tutors offered suggestions for overcoming these difficulties and surviving the corrective-feedback trials and tribulations. The survival tips presented were drawn from the tutors’ recommendations as well as from insights from corrective-feedback research. Devrait-on corriger les erreurs de langue de nos etudiants? La plupart des enseignants d’ALS repondraient a cette question par un oui categorique tout en se demandant comment relever ce defi. Le projet collaboratif decrit ci-dessous a ete concu pour fournir aux stagiaires en ALS une occasion de vivre les hauts et les bas lies au fait de presenter de la retroaction corrective aux travaux ecrits, et de se conscientiser a cet egard. A cette fin, les stagiaires ont joue le role de tuteurs fournissant de la retroaction corrective a des eleves du secondaire pendant un semestre. Au cours de projet, ils ont tenu un journal pour noter leurs reflexions relatives a cette pratique pedagogique exigeante. Parmi les obstacles les plus importants auxquels les tuteurs ont fait face, notons les contraintes de temps, la motivation et la peur de se tromper eux-memes ou de ne pas fournir des conseils adequats aux eleves. Lors d’entrevues qui ont eu lieu a la fin du projet, les tuteurs ont offert des suggestions pour surmonter ces difficultes et survivre aux vicissitudes de la retroaction corrective. Les conseils de survie presentes sont tires des recommandations des tuteurs et des perspectives decoulant de la recherche sur la retroaction corrective.

The Pedagogy of Error Correction: Surviving the Written Corrective Feedback Challenge