English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

espanolSon diversas las sentencias del Tribunal Constitucional que han marcado importantes precedentes. Dichos precedentes contienen un elemento normativo, lo que determina la actuacion jurisdiccional en un gran numero de casos futuros. En el presente articulo, el autor desarrolla como la sentencia del caso Vasquez Romero ha marcado un precedente de gran importancia respecto del acceso al Tribunal Constitucional. La autora analizara el impacto de dicho precedente en la causal de rechazo de los recursos de agravio constitucional por tratarse de casos sustancialmente iguales. EnglishThere are several judgments of the Constitutional Court that have marked important precedents. These precedents contain a normative element, which determines the jurisdictional action in a great number of future cases. In this article, the author develops how the judgment of the case Vasquez Romero has set a precedent of great importance regarding access to the Constitutional Court. The author will analyze the impact of this precedent on the grounds for rejection of the constitutional grievance remedies as they are substantially equal cases.

Precedentes sin precedente: los casos sustancialmente iguales como causal de rechazo de los recursos de agravio constitucional