English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The aim of this article is to compare the metaphysics of Raimon Panikkar and Fernando Inciarte. When examining, in the first two parts, the way in which both answer to the main metaphysical question of what it is, we find the apparently opposed approaches of a metaphysics of substance (Inciarte) and a metaphysics of the system based on the cosmotheandric intuition, which has relations as the fundamental category (Panikkar). In the third part, we compare both approaches in order to assess the role that the notion of system plays in them so as to determine, in the end, that the metaphysics of substance is more related to the metaphysics of the system than it may appear at first.

El holismo cosmoteándrico de Raimon Panikkar y el holismo sustancial de Fernando Inciarte: ¿dos metafísicas de sistema?