English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article analyzes and evaluates the judgment issued by the Supreme Administrative Court on November 17 2014, which referred to the possibility of including tax costs by the heir of expenses for the acquisition of units incurred by the testator. Although the beneficial ruling for taxpayers deserves approval, it can not be accepted that the general principles of tax succession were omitted, as the court focused only on the material provision.

Glosa częściowo aprobująca do uchwały Najwyższego Sądu Administracyjnego z 17 listopada 2014 r., II FPS 3/14