English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Knowing the past of a discipline is essential to fully understand its present. However, mainstream social psychologists show some lack of interest and poor knowledge about the past of social psychology. This might be a result of the role that “offi cial” histories of the discipline play in their education. Indeed, the historical period covered by the relevant chapters of the Handbook of Social Psychology is being progressively shortened, and these chapters are written from a presentist perspective that takes the current state of the discipline as the most evolved of all, which is a natural consequence of its ever-improving past. This view does not refl ect the actual development of a discipline, which is not linear. Only a contextualist history may refl ect it, and the novice social psychologists must look at contextualist writings to understand the historical developments of social psychology.

Sobre el Desinterés por la Historia de la Psicología Social