English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Fibulin-3 has emerged as a promising novel biomarker in conforming or monitoring malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This study sought to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic efficacies of humoral fibulin-3 for MPM. Seven eligible publications comprising 468 MPM cases for diagnosis, and 138 for prognosis were identified. Results manifested that humoral fibulin-3 sustained a pooled sensitivity of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.45-0.77) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89) in discriminating MPM patients from cancer-free individuals, corresponding to an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.81. For the survival analysis, fibulin-3 expression was not markedly associated with overall survival (OS) time of the MPM patients [HR (hazard ratio): 1.84, 95% CI: 0.75-4.56, P = 0.185]. In the subgroup analyses stratified by test matrix and ethnicity, data revealed that serum-based fibulin-3 examination achieved superior accuracy than plasma-based analysis (sensitivity: 0.77 versus 0.54; specificity: 0.85 versus 0.77; AUC: 0.92 versus 0.69); additionally, testing of fibulin-3 in Europeans retained higher efficacy than those in Americans and Australians. Taken together, fibulin-3 confers a relatively high diagnostic efficacy and is acceptable to be an auxiliary biomarker to aid in MPM identification.

Diagnostic and prognostic utilities of humoral fibulin-3 in malignant pleural mesothelioma: Evidence from a meta-analysis