English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This book under review examines current relations between equity and compensable damages, since in the definition of these damages the equity plays a critical role. Through an analysis of recent decisions of both the Supreme Court of Justice and the Council of State on the typologies and reparation of non-pecuniary damages, the author deduces that, in some cases, guidelines applied by both Tribunals go against the equity and integral reparation rules. This book review exposes, comments and completes Professor M’Causland’s thesis, by showing weaknesses in the existing jurisprudence, while renewing a well-known debate around the judicial recognition of non-pecuniary damages.

Problemáticas teórico-prácticas en las categorías del daño inmaterial reconocidas por la jurisprudencia colombiana