English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The emergency caused by the covid-19 pandemic is a new chapter in the debate on judicial control of so-called states of emergency. Based on the recommendations made by the World Health Organization (who) for States to take urgent action for the identification, confirmation, isolation and treatment of confirmed cases, the Governments of Ecuador and Colombia decreed a state of emergency. The first, by means of Executive Decree 1017. The second, by Legislative Decree 417 of March 17, 2020. In light of the above, the purpose of this paper is to examine the basis and scope of constitutional control of States of Emergency in Ecuador and Colombia. This article favors the descriptive method, in order to draw a kind of parallelism between the different elements that make up the constitutional control of states of emergency in these two legal systems.

Control constitucional de los estados de excepción en Ecuador y Colombia: un enfoque comparado