English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Spanish Abstract: Este articulo sugiere que se advierte un consenso en torno a la necesidad de recortar competencias del tribunal constitucional chileno, pero que la reflexion al respecto es aun poco desarrollada. Por eso, agrega que la justificacion general de la jurisdiccion constitucional tiene que argumentar que ella hace algo –velar epistemicamente por los resultados del proceso democratico– que no hacen ni el parlamento ni el gobierno, y que una justificacion especial de la misma podria conducir a alguna forma de constitucionalismo debil y dialogico en la senda del nuevo modelo constitucional de la Commonwealth.English Abstract: This paper posits that there is a growing consensus on the need to reduce the powers of the Chilean constitutional court, while conceding that this issue has received little treatment to date. The general purpose of constitutional justice would be to do something particular, different from what government or congress does; namely to look out epistemically for the results of the democratic process. And a specific and contextualized defense of constitutional justice could lead to a form of weak and dialogic constitutionalism along the lines of the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism.

Una alternativa contra la hipertrofia de la justicia constitucional chilena