English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

By expanding the archaeological research in Amapa, new  contexts emerged, demanding thinking on how to classify the archaeological material. The argument I make here begins with an investigation into how the Koriabo phase concept has been used in other areas of the Guyana Shield. In most cases, the term Koriabo has been widely generalized in the archeology of the region. As a result, the similarities and differences are neglected, with a strong tendency towards homogenization. However, recent excavations in French Guyana and Amapa point to different contexts of pottery deposition. In Amapa, detailed excavations over wide surfaces have offered new basis for thinking about classifications, departing from the knowledge of depositional contexts. Based on argument here developed, I suggest that it is necessary to broaden the focus in particular contexts before we turn to the general classifications, so we can to refine our data and interpretations. Keywords: Koriabo phase, archaeology of Guyanas, classifcation

JUNTANDO CACOS: UMA REFLEXÃO SOBRE A CLASSIFICAÇÃO DA FASE KORIABO NO AMAPÁ