English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Resumen  Ante el gran problema de expansion y las malas condiciones de vida de los barrios de la periferia de las ciudades latinoamericanas, una primera y rapida conclusion podria ser que no han existido criterios de sostenibilidad en el Planeamiento Urbanistico o Territorial que controlara este problema. Sin embargo, en el caso de la ciudad de Quito (Ecuador), encontramos seis Planes de Ordenacion desde 1942 al 2012, que una vez evaluados, a partir de los criterios de sostenibilidad establecidos por Jose Manuel Naredo y Jose Farina en el Libro Blanco de la Sostenibilidad en el Planeamiento Urbanistico Espanol (2010), se concluye que los criterios de sostenibilidad han estado presentes y eran avanzados con respecto a otros planes reguladores latinoamericanos en este periodo. Quito ha mantenido interes por ser una ciudad planificada durante sus distintas etapas historicas de crecimiento, lamentablemente la realidad no es sostenible, radicandose el problema en una falta de gestion de los planes que no ha permitido su eficacia. Ahora es necesario que una nueva vision de la ciudad incorpore a la gestion urbana, el conocimiento de la capacidad de carga del territorio, la armonizacion con su paisaje, y el establecimiento de medidas preventivas frente a los riesgos naturales como nuevos retos en los Planes Directores futuros.Abstract:  Given the great problem of expansion and poor living conditions of the neighborhoods on the outskirts of Latin American cities, a first quick conclusion could be that there were no sustainability criteria in the Urban and Territorial Planning to control this problem. However, in the case of the city of Quito (Ecuador), we find six Management Plans from 1942 to 2012, once evaluated, based on sustainability criteria established by J. M. Naredo and J. Farina in the Sustainability White Paper in Spanish Urban Planning (2010), we concluded that the sustainability criteria have been present and were advanced compared to other Latin American Masters Plans in this period. Quito has maintained interest in being a planned city during its different historical stages of growth, unfortunately the reality is not sustainable, settling the problem on a lack of management plans has not allowed its effectiveness. Now it is necessary that a new vision of the city should incorporate urban management, knowledge of the capacity of the territory, harmonization with the landscape, and the establishment of preventive measures against natural risks and new challenges in the future Master Plans.

Sustainable urban evaluation of Quito´s Master Plans. Period 1942-2012