English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1 MBBS, MS (General Surgery), DNB (General Surgery), MRCS (Edin, UK), DNB (Urology) Lecturer in Urology, Super Specialty Hospital, Government Medical College, Srinagar, J&K – 190010 2 MBBS, MS, MCh (Urology), Professor of Urology, Grant Government Medical College & Sir J J Hospitals Mumbai, Maharashtra – 400008 3 MBBS, MS, Associate Professor in Urology, Grant Government Medical College & Sir J J Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400008 Corresponding Author Dr Omar Salim Akhtar MBBS, MS (General Surgery), DNB (General Surgery), MRCS (Edin, UK), DNB (Urology) Lecturer in Urology, Super Specialty Hospital, Government Medical College, Srinagar, J&K – 190010 Abstract Introduction: Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome is a debilitating condition that is one of the most common reasons for visits to Urologists among male patients under the age of 50. Recently, a phenotypic method of classification and assessment of the disease has been introduced and validated. However, its use has not been studied in an Indian population so far. Materials and Methods: Male patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) attending a single out-patient clinic at a tertiary-care hospital were prospectively evaluated using the NIH-CPSI score and UPOINT domains. Data from the evaluation was collated and analysed. Results: A total of 30 patients who met the criteria for CP/CPPS were evaluated. Average age of the patients was 34.37 years. The positive domains were Urinary (27), Psychosocial (18), Organ-specific (13), Infection (8), Neurological/Systemic (5), Tenderness (4). Patients had an average IPSS score of (9.4). In the NIH-CPSI scores, the pain score average was (11.37), urinary scores were (6.03), and the Quality of Life domain scores were (7.2). The average NIH-CPSI score was 24.93. Discussion: This study is probably the first time the NIH-CPSI score and UPOINT phenotype system has been studied in an Indian population. It was seen that the UPOINT domains were useful in classifying the disease and directing multimodal treatment.

Clinical Use of the UPOINT Classification in Indian Patients with Chronic Prostatitis or Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome