English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1 Professor & Head, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, GR Medical College, Gwalior (MP) 1 Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sri Aurboindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore (MP) 3 EX-Resident, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, GR Medical College, Gwalior (MP) Corresponding Author Dr Jyoti Bindal 11, J.A. Hospital Campus, Gwalior (MP) Email: drjyotibindal@bindal.me, 9826255566 Abstract Background: A women with previous caesarean birth has two options in her subsequent delivery, either planned elective repeat caesarean or planned vaginal birth. Both the options are associated with risks and benefits. Aims and Objective: To study the factors associated with vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery (VBAC) and associated fetal and maternal outcome. Materials and Methods: Two hundred women with previous one lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) were included in the study conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kamla Raja Hospital, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior from November 2013 to October 2014. All the women were divided in to elective repeat Caesarean section (ERCS) group (women who delivered through caesarean section after trial of labor) and VBAC group (patient who delivered through vaginal route after trial of labor). Both the groups were studied for age, parity, gestation age, indication for previous CS, reason for failed trial and neonatal birth weight. Results: In VBAC group, most of the patients (48%) belong to age group of 26-30 years, most of them were having gestation age of 37-40 weeks (60%), most common indication for previous CS was malpresentation (40%) followed by fetal distress (30%). Non-progress of labour (48%) was the common cause of failed trial of labour and 86% of the neonates of VBAC group had birth weight of ≤3 kgs. Maternal complications were more in ERCS group compared to VBAC group. Conclusion: In all women with prior CS, if selected properly on the basis of predictive factors can be successfully tried for VBAC.

Study of Factors Associated With Success of Vaginal Birth after Previous One Caesarean Section