English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

There are three different types of village research conducted in Turkish sociology in the process from the founding discussions of the Village Institutes to their closure. These, monographic village research of Social Science School (1936-1952), village research of Mumtaz Turhan (1936-1948) between village researchs of Niyazi Berkes and Behice Boran (1939 -1942). The first, proposes a social change aimed at an individualistic society and based on personal assertiveness. The second one emphasizes the elements of mentality in social change and approaches to village and peasant education with a synthesisist approach. The third one it prioritizes an infrastructural/technological change in the village and predicts social change as a natural result of this process. In this study, the relationship between the social change targeted by institutes and the results of village studies in sociology was examined. The importance of social structure research in socio-cultural institution building has been revealed by the experience of Village Institutes.

Türkiye’de Köy Sosyolojisi Araştırmaları ile Köy Enstitüleri Fikrinin İlişkisel İncelenmesi