English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: Calibration of clinical prediction models often entails assessing goodness of fit with independent, non-identically distributed Bernoulli random variables. We here investigate two statistics studied by Copas in this setting.&#x0D;Materials and Methods: We present distribution theory and a simulation study to compare the operating characteristics of the Copas statistics.&#x0D;Results: In our simulation study with relatively small sample sizes, we found a simple Cornish Fisher approximation tail quantiles of the distributions of the Copas statistics to perform adequately. Upon illustrating their use in a calibration study relating to prediction of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, power properties appear to reflect differential weighting accorded to observations, as evinced with other goodness of fit statistics.&#x0D;Conclusion: The Copas statistics are easily implemented, have proven value in other contexts, and appear to be underutilized in calibration studies. They ought to be part of the armamentarium of calibration tools for all researchers

A Note on Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models with Copas Statistics