English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Plus

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Zendy Tools

Zendy Open

The Violence refers to a name that colombian historiography has given to the period after the assassination of a liberal politician Jorge Eliecer Gaitan on 9 April 1948. But violence also relates to a concept which involves debates about the colombian historical experience since the mid-forties to the present day. During the seventies and eighties this concept began to be juxtaposed to the question of populism in Colombia. What kind of disputes and articulations occurred in the political and intellectual field between the notion of populism and the "Violence(s)"? Which modalities assumed the representation of the figure of the people? And how the "gaitanismo" was resignified during these years? Those are some of the questions that will guide the following analysis. To do this, we will focus on the approach of three pioneers sociological and historical studies in which the representations of the Violence(s), populism and gaitanismo were imbricated to think forms of constitution of "the political".

Colombia y los nombres de lo político. Populismo, Violencia(s) y gaitanismo