English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

On the basis of the National Corpus of the Russian language, it is shown that the current trend of modern Russian to loose of declension of toponyms of the neuter gender, ending on -ino, -ovo, is a consequence of the increased internal migration of the Russian population. As a result of migration, cases of communication among people with unequal background knowledge have become frequent, which leads to the development of analyticism, and in particular, to the loss of declension of nouns like Pushkino or Izmailovo. The fact is that only the use of indeclinable forms of these toponyms gives uninformed addressees the opportunity to determine that such toponyms are nouns of the neuter, and not of the masculine gender, for example, that it is mentioned a town called Pushkino, not Pushkin.

vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. seriâ russkaâ filologiâ/vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. seriâ: russkaâ filologiâ

«NEDAROM POMNIT VSYA ROSSIYA PRO DEN’... BORODINO», OR WHY TOPONYMS ENDING ON -INO, -OVO STOP TO BE DECLINED