English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author continues to explore the issues of persuasion in adversarial criminal process and considers the lawyers’ art of rhetoric as a means of convincing argumentation and effective solution of the problems. Referring to Cicero the author states: ‘Persuasive speaking at court is based on three principles: to prove the righteousness of what we advocate, to get the listeners favorably disposed to you, to direct their thoughts the way it is needed for the case’. It is concluded that without proper training in rhetoric a lawyer cannot become either a good prosecutor or an advocate even if he/she is judicially competent, as at a highly proficient level such duties may be performed only by a professional who combines deep knowledge of laws with the art of public speaking. © Мельник В.В., 2016.

vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. seriâ: ûrisprudenciâ/vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. seriâ ûrisprudenciâ

LAWYERS’ PUBLIC SPEAKING SKILLS AS A MEANS OF CONSTRUCTING CONVINCING ARGUMENTS IN ADVERSARIAL CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM