English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This paper examines the linguistic tools adopted by Twitter Englishspeaking users to express their personal opinion on the immigration issues in the EU and the USA. The purpose of the current research is to defi ne the link between the content of the message and the way it is expressed either implicitly or explicitly. The investigation is based on the content analysis of tweets collected for fi ve months and processed by program Atlas.ti. The fi ndings of this research illustrate how Twitter users communicate with each other and discuss political and social issues, and in what way they infl uence each other’s opinion using various linguistic tools while being restricted to only 140 characters.

IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT WAY OF EXPRESSING PERSONAL OPINION ON MIGRATION PROBLEM ON TWITTER