English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

During his election campaign, the new president of Mexico, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador proposed to grant amnesty to those involved in drug production and trafficking in order to finish the War on drugs, moving between taboo and pragmatism. Undoubtedly, this initiative is a radical change from the state approach to this conflict because it considers a classic tools of peace process, such as, demobilization, reintegration and transitional justice. However, what are the main risks of supply? This reflection article aims to answer this question, analyzing, under a qualitative approach, the main constraints faced by this proposal. The main conclusion is that amnesty is only containment damage strategy since it doesn't seek to modify the scale of the illicit market, but model their behavior: low profile, without a position of open confrontation and moderate levels of lethality.

Taboo or pragmatism? Lopez Obrador’s dilemma over drug trafficking