English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this article is to compare the 24 Knowledge Management Maturity Models (MMGC) found in the open access academic literature in: JSTOR, Emerald, Scopus, Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, Scielo, Google Scholar, EBSCO Business Source Premier and Engineering Village between 2001 and 2016. The comparison criteria used corresponded to those proposed by Martinez (2015). It was identified that the most appropriate MMGC for the GC´s maturity diagnosis execution is the Teah, Pee & Kankanhalli´s (2006) GC maturity general model.

A propósito de los modelos de madurez de gestión del conocimiento