English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

It is a review article that shows some advances as for the sources of law and its application to the concrete case of the judgments of the Colombian Supreme Court of Justice, during the period 2005-2008. Thus, this article shows some results of the research, that begun in January of 2007 and has been financed by Facultad de Ciencias Juridicas of Pontificia Universidad Javeriana. The article is divided into four main parts: the first one is dedicated to outline the field of study and the problematic; the second one studies the methodology; the third one shows the results, while the last one confronts imaginaries with the results of the judicial activity. The main conclusions were that case law is not a secondary criterion, as stated in article 230 of the Colombian Constitution, and that judicial precedent could be better used by the Supreme Court of Justice.

Maginarios y resultados de la actividad judicial en la responsabilidad civil en Colombia