English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article is an analysis of judicial discretion seen as a characteristic of legal positivism from the way judicial precedents are understood in Brazil. The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate that judicial precedents are applied arbitrarily by Brazilian jurisprudence and doctrine, revealing the interpretative abuses by the judiciary and the weakening of democracy. The approach is an hermeneutic-phenomenological method, that is, a critical reconstruction of the phenomenon of judicial precedent interpretation. As a result, the document shows the fragility of constitutional democracy before the interpretive discretion of courts from the way precedents are applied in Brazil.

Un ensayo sobre el problema de la discrecionalidad y la mala comprensión de los precedentes judiciales