English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article compares the 'systematic method' of continental German private law with the common law method. It starts out by discussing the characteristics of a systematic approach, its application to European private law as well as its methodological tools. The author submits that the systematic approach is not inherently different but, on the contrary, is rather similar to the common law approach, irrespective of a difference in the (major) sources of law (statutes vs case law). What both approaches have in common is, in particular, that they take an internal perspective on the law rather than the external perspective that characterises the 'law and ...' approaches. The latter can inform the interpretation and application of the law only to a limited extent.

English common law versus German <em>Systemdenken?</em><br>Internal versus external approaches