English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Federal States, their administration of justice and their justice administrations, are characterized by differences in organizational settings, deficiencies in policy implementation, variations of policy outcomes as well as a dearth of information. Defendants of federal States claim that these well-known negative aspects of federalism are – largely – outbalanced by the speedier processes, efficacy and the efficiency of its largely autonomous units. In the field of the administration of justice, especially in penal justice and correctional programs, federalism must however also be considered with regard to the respect of principles of equal treatment, of equality before the law, of the state of law, all presumably protected by the Constitution.

Justice and Court Administrations, their Workings and Efficiency in Switzerland: Aspects of Sentencing and its Outcome in Swiss Cantons