English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

: Tell the Truth, Do Justice: The Truth-Finding Trials in Argentina In the late 90’s the so-called ‘Truth-Finding Trials’ made their appearance in different cities of Argentina. In the course of the hearings, the families and survivors spoke out against the magnitude of repression and the civil participation in state terrorism; individual members of the Armed Forces were forced to attend law courts to testify. For these reasons, from the beginning, these ‘trials’ generated strong conflicts and political disputes mainly between the State, the human rights movement and other social actors interested in either promoting or blocking a judicial review of the dictatorial past. In the present work we investigate some dimensions little explored in the bibliography specialized on the truth-finding trials, particularly the positions taken by different actors at these trials. The idea guiding this article is that these trials were the result of different legal, political and procedural strategies, which taken together allow the visualization of different methods used in the construction of these trials. Resumen: A finales de la decada de los 90 hicieron su aparicion en distintas ciudades de la Argentina los denominados ‘Juicios por la Verdad’. En el marco de las audiencias los familiares y sobrevivientes denunciaron la magnitud de la represion y la participacion civil en el terrorismo de Estado; distintos miembros de la Fuerzas Armadas se vieron obligados a concurrir a estrados judiciales a brindar testimonio. Por estos motivos, desde un comienzo, estos ‘juicios’ generaron fuertes conflictos y disputas politicas principalmente entre el Estado, el movimiento de derechos humanos y otros actores sociales interesados en promover u obturar una revision judicial del pasado dictatorial. En el trabajo que aqui presentamos indagamos en algunas dimensiones poco exploradas en la bibliografia especializada acerca de los Juicios por la verdad, en particular las posiciones de distintos actores frente a los mismos. La idea que guia este articulo es que estos juicios fueron el resultado de diferentes estrategias juridicas, politicas y procesales que, en conjunto permiten visualizar la existencia de distintos modos de construccion de estos juicios.

Decir la verdad, hacer justicia: Los Juicios por la Verdad en Argentina