English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Dear Editor, The letter to the Editor of Lippi and Henry published in the European Journal of Internal Medicine and entitled ‘Active smoking is not associated with severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)’ had errors and led to the wrong conclusion. Lippi and Henry searched PubMed and Web of Science up to 9 March 2020, and identified 5 studies with data on smoking and severity of COVID-19. They performed a meta-analysis revealing a pooled OR of 1.69 (95% CI: 0.41–6.92) and concluded that active smoking does not seem to be significantly associated with enhanced risk of progressing towards severe disease in COVID-19. There were several mistakes in their data collection that led to errors in the meta-analysis. In table 1 of their letter, they indicated the outcome of Guan et al. study to be ‘Admission to ICU, mechanical ventilation, death’, however, they used the data of ‘severe disease’ in the study. According to the Guan et al. paper, the number of patients having composite outcome should be 66, and for patients not having a composite outcome should be 1019. However, Lippi and Henry used 172 and 913, respectively, in their paper. This is the most serious mistake because the Guan et al. study contributes to most of the cases in the meta-analysis. Moreover, the non-severe patients in the Huang et al. study should be 28 and not 31. The non-severe patients in the Yang et al. study should be 20 and not 18. The severe patients in the Zhang et al. should be 58 and not 60. The errors led to the wrong sample size of these 3 studies as well. Lippi and Henry were only correct in one out of the 5 studies. I performed an updated meta-analysis according to the correct data using RevMan Ver. 5.3, and provide the forest plot (Figure 1). The pooled OR was 2.20 (95% CI: 1.31–3.67; p=0.003). The heterogeneity was moderate (I=57%). There was no obvious publication bias by the funnel plot. Though there are new studies published after the Lippi and Henry paper, the purpose of this letter is to correct their errors, therefore new studies are not included in the updated meta-analysis. In a systemic review published by Vardavas and Nikitara, 5 studies were included. Though meta-analysis was not performed in that study, the authors AFFILIATION 1 Department of Family Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan 2 Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City, Taiwan

Active smoking is associated with severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 ): An update of a meta-analysis