English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objective: To compare the clinical eff ects of Amiodarone and Propafenone in the treatment of arrhythmia. Methods: Choose our hospital 100 cases of patients with cardiac arrhythmias. We shall divided into control group (50 cases, Propafenone treatment) and treatment group (50 cases, Amiodarone therapy), to collect the curative eff ect of two groups of patients, adverse reactions, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, headache, low blood pressure, heart rate slow down) in accordance with the drug treatment and electrocardiogram (ecg) changes before and after the treatment (PR interphase, QT interphase, QRS duration). Results: Control group and the clinical curative eff ect of treatment group total eff ectiveness 98%, 86% respectively, the treatment group is signifi cantly higher than the control group. Control group and treatment group the incidence of adverse reactions were 4%, 12%, treatment group was signifi cantly lower than the control group, and two groups of patients duration are improved after treatment stage PR interval and QT, QRS. But the treatment group patients with stage PR interval and QT, such as electrocardiogram QRS duration change was better than control group, which diff erence has statistical signifi cance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with propafenone, amiodarone in the treatment of arrhythmia patients has better therapeutic eff ect and higher safety, and improve the clinical symptoms of patients eff ectively. It is suggested to promote clinical practice.

Comparing the Clinical Effects of Amiodarone and Propafenone in the Arrhythmia’s Treatment