English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Received: 16 August 2019 Accepted: 20 February 2020 In this paper, a comparative study between field oriented control and Backstepping adaptive control for a doubly fed induction motor (DFIM) is proposed. At the beginning, the mathematical model of the DFIM is presented. Thereafter, these control strategies are described and designed, then implemented using the Matlab/Simulink environment. Finally, the different strategies are compared in terms of static and dynamic error, response time, overshoot and robustness. The results of the comparison clearly show that the Backstepping adaptive control provides better performance and is characterized by high robustness vis-a-vis parametric variations.

Comparative Study Between Backstepping Adaptive and Field Oriented Controls for Doubly Fed Induction Motor