English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper aims to analyze whether the theories of extension of the effects of the arbitration clause to non-signatory third parties are opposite to the principle of contractual relativity. In order to reach an answer, a number of jurisprudence decisions have been analyzed in which it has been determined that it is possible to include a non-signatory third party to the arbitration process based on an implicit consent. In this way, I will try to prove that, based on the previous mentioned conducts, during and after the celebration of the arbitration agreement, arbitration can be accepted, even by a party that did not sign it, and also not causing a collision with the principle res inter alios acta. .

El área gris entre la relatividad de los contratos y la inclusión de terceros no signatarios en el arbitraje