English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the development of Czech economic thought, the process of separating of economic science (the national economy) is a Methodenstreit between the German historical school and the Austrian school, and other disputes. These are disputes related to the epistemological crisis associated with the fear of further development of economic science. Disputes focus, besides others things, on the discussion of the relationship between economic theory and economic reality, on the discussion of the relationship between national economic theory and national economic policy. It results into the concept of economic science and systematics in the work of Karel Engliš (1880 1963), Josef Macek (1887 1972), Cyril Čechrák (1890 1974) and Vilibald Mildschuh (1878 1938) on the other hand. The disputes also affect habilitation proceedings, professorship procedures, selection of candidates for various positions, etc. at higher education institutions in the Czech lands.

The Methodenstreit between the German historical school and the Austrian school and Czech economic thought in the Czechoslovak Republic