English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The article deals with theoretical and practical dimension of the third generation of Basel regulatory standards. The implementation proves more complex than previously supposed. Modern bank regulation theory focus mainly on four areas: factors that lies beyond bank equity pricing, transmission channels of banking crisis on the international level, optimal design of the safety net, well-balanced intensity of regulatory restrictions. Unfortunately, in the real world, bank regulation standards do not often follow the recommendations of economic theory. The rules remain to be subject of policy influence of diverse advocacy groups including banks themselves. The aim of this article is to outline the main ways of actual economic research and the challenges that lie ahead. Special attention is paid to such issues as capital adequacy, moral hazard and tax distorsion of debt financing. The influence of increased capital adequacy requirements, actual income tax policy and deregulation on the stability of commercial banks is being questioned within the study.

Theoretical backgrounds of modern bank regulation