English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article aims to criticize the actual understanding in Peruvian judicial and arbitration practice that the determination of controversial points merely consists in transcribing the requests of the complaint. Contrary to this, this text proposes that the judge or arbitrator should perform a truly activity of organization of the proce-dure, consisting in determining the relevant facts, the admission and exclusion of the evidence and the legal issues offered by the parties.

“Fijación de puntos controvertidos”: una guía para jueces y árbitros