English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Eugenio Bulygin, in one of  his first published work, dated 1965 ( Der Begriff der Wirkamkeit ), considers the concept of effectiveness, in which it develops a critique of the theory of Alf Ross and, in order to clarify this criticism, reflects on the design of Hans Kelsen on the effectiveness of Law. From that moment it gave a true debate between Bulygin and Ross, but it was not news, by the year 2002, nearly 20 years after the death of Kelsen (1881-1973), any response to this Bulygin respect of that article 1965 until the Hans Kelsen Institute of Vienna located a manuscript, probably written between 1967 and 1970, in which Kelsen polemic with Bulygin on the subject of the validity and effectiveness of the Law, so that only recently Bulygin could present its rejoinder the debate in question. The article addresses this debate between Bulygin and Kelsen, where it comes to issues such as the justification of the judgment and logic deductibility of legal rules; the idea of judicial competence; applicability; the distinction between legal system and order. Anyway, we have from this debate an important key to the refinement of the pure theory of Law, their logical relations, their intangible basic premises as legal positivism, ethical skepticism, the separation between “is” ( Sein ) and “ougth” ( Sollen ) and neutrality scientific. Key-words : Controversy Bulygin-Kelsen on Validity and Effectiveness; Legal positivism; Ethical skepticism; Deductibility Logic of Legal Standards RESUMO Eugenio Bulygin, em um de seus primeiros trabalhos publicados, datado de 1965 ( Der Begriff der Wirkamkeit ), tece consideracoes sobre o conceito de eficacia, em que se desenvolve uma critica a teoria da Alf Ross e, com o intuito de aclarar essa critica, tece consideracoes sobre a concepcao de Hans Kelsen sobre a eficacia do direito. A partir daquele momento se deu um debate efetivo entre Bulygin e Ross, porem nao se teve noticia, ate o ano de 2002, quase 20 anos apos o falecimento de Kelsen (1881-1973), de alguma resposta deste a Bulygin relativamente aquele seu artigo de 1965, ate que o Instituto Hans Kelsen de Viena localizou um manuscrito, provavelmente redigido entre 1967 e 1970, em que Kelsen polemiza com Bulygin acerca do tema da validade e eficacia do direito, de maneira que apenas mais recentemente Bulygin pode apresentar a sua treplica no debate em questao. O artigo trata desse debate entre Bulygin e Kelsen, em que se trata de temas como a justificacao da decisao judicial e a dedutibilidade logica das normas juridicas; a ideia de aptidao judicial; a aplicabilidade; a distincao entre sistema e ordem juridicos. Enfim, tem-se a partir desse debate uma importante chave para o refinamento da teoria pura do direito, de suas relacoes logicas, das suas premissas basicas intangiveis como sendo o positivismo juridico, o ceticismo etico, a separacao entre ser e dever e a neutralidade cientifica. Palavras-chave : Polemica Bulygin-Kelsen sobre Validade e Eficacia; Positivismo Juridico; Ceticismo Etico; Dedutibilidade Logica das Normas Juridicas

The Debate Between Bulygin and Kelsen on the Validity and Efficacy of Law