English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

RESUMO: Este artigo possui por objeto, a partir de abordagem multidisciplinar, a investigacao das decisoes colegiadas, das premissas que incentivam sua instituicao, dos problemas que podem provocar e dos requisitos necessarios para que realmente produzam melhores resultados. Pretende-se, a partir disso, indicar as precaucoes e informacoes que deverao adotadas e antevistas para a prescricao de desenhos institucionais apropriados para que decisoes mais racionais sejam produzidas. Busca-se, pois, discutir as perspectivas teoricas que recomendam irrefletidamente instituicoes colegiadas sem a adequada reflexao do desenho institucional dos incentivos internos e institucionais dos agentes. Tem-se, assim, que a hipotese se baseia na demonstracao de que colegiados nem sempre decidirao melhor por imperfeicao dos desenhos institucionais, e, nestes casos, a agregacao de individuos, inclusive de juizes, nao produzira beneficios, podendo, inclusive, produzir piores resultados. Palavras-Chave : Decisoes colegiados. Desenho institucional. Incentivos. ABSTRACT: This paper has as its object, from a multidisciplinary approach, the investigation of collegiate decisions, assumptions that encourage their institution, problems they may cause and necessary requirements for they really produce better results. It is intended thereby indicate the precautions and information to be considered for prescribing institutional designs appropriate for making more rational decisions. The paper intends to discuss the theoretical perspectives that recommend thoughtlessly collegiate institutions without proper reflection of institutional and incentives of agents. The hypothesis is based on evidence that collegiate bodies not always take betters decision because of the imperfection of institutional designs, and in these cases aggregating individuals, including judges, have no benefit and may have worse results. Keywords : collegiate decisions; self-centered decisions; institutional design

Teoria institucional e decisões colegiadas: novos parâmetros de análise / Institutional theory and collective decisions: new analysis parameters