English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article focuses on the discussion with Dr. Seifert’s work “Civil Opposition to Religious Radicalism in Central Asia” (2020). The author, being supportive of many dr. Seifert’s theses, disagreed with his actual division of Islam into the so-called “good” traditional Islam (moderate, flexible, and compatible with the secular state) and the “bad” radical Islam, which denies secular values and therefore should be marginalised. Based on the results of her own field research, the author demonstrates, that modern Islamic fundamentalist communities are diverse in their goals and positioning, and their religious outlook does not unequivocally determine their political agenda. Fundamentalist Islam can also be the instrument not only of the negative, but also of the positive adaptation to the post-communist crisis. The author also stresses that the desire to suppress alternative outlook to safeguard the secular basics of society constitutes the internal threat to liberal and democratic values.

Prospects and Threats of Radicalization and Combating It. Heretical Thoughts. Based on the Work of Dr. Arne Seifert