English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Como el titulo sugiere, el articulo pretende reflexionar sobre el punto de vista de la sociologia sobre la moda, exagerando ironicamente lo especifico de su punto de vista hasta elevarlo a “privilegiado”. Utilizo esa exageracion para llamar la atencion sobre la doble dimension teorica de esa mirada. Una primera, facil de entender, y quizas de aceptar, subraya la lectura sociologica de una moda ya pasada, como puede hacerlo la historia del arte, del traje o de la moda. Otra segunda, atreviendose a reflexionar, o a invitarnos a reflexionar, sobre su otro punto de vista. Aquel que condicionaria el nacimiento mismo de la moda desde la sociologia. La moda a posteriori es analizada, la moda a priori tambien, y aqui, donde la moda es efecto de una causa sociologica, y no al reves, es donde radicaria el verdadero interes de mi articulo. ?Son antes los pantalones femeninos, el traje femenino, el smoking femenino –robados psicoanaliticamente al hombre durante el siglo XX– o la emancipacion de la mujer? ?Aparecio siempre la minifalda despues de la liberacion sexual femenina o alguna vez, en algun pais, fue al reves? ?El movimiento hippie creo siempre una moda hippie o la imitacion de la moda hippie invito, en su onda expansiva mundial, a un estilo de vida consecuente con ese cambio de ropa? Estamos acostumbrados a que la moda sea un efecto, ?puede ser una causa? Estamos acostumbrados a que la sociologia explique un fenomeno, ?aceptariamos que a veces se pueda convertir en su causa? PALABRAS CLAVE: sociologia, moda, causa, objeto de arte, contexto. ABSTRACT As the title suggests, this article aims to reflect on the sociological viewpoint on fashion, ironically exaggerating the specifics of its point of view to elevate it to the point of “privilege”. I use this exaggeration to draw attention to the theoretical double dimension of that viewpoint. A first one, easy to understand and perhaps to accept, highlights the sociological reading of past fashion trends, as may History of Art, Costume or Fashion. A second one would dare to reflect, or to invite us to reflect, on this other point of view, one that would condition the very birth of Fashion from Sociology. Fashion is analyzed both a posteriori and a priori, and here, where Fashion is the effect of a sociological cause, and not the other way round, is where the true interest of my article would lie. Do women’s trousers, women’s tailored suits, women’s tuxedos –psychoanalytically robbed from men during the twentieth century– precede the emancipation of women or is it the other way around? Did the miniskirt always appear after women’s sexual liberation, or was it the other way around in some countries? Did the hippie movement give rise to the hippie clothes style or did the hippie style, in its worldwide expansion, invite participation in a lifestyle consistent with that change in clothing? We are used to seeing Fashion as an effect. Could it be a cause? We are used to Sociology explaining a phenomenon, would we be willing to accept that it can at times be the cause of it? KEY WORDS: sociology, fashion, cause, art object, context.

Sociología de la moda, un punto de vista privilegiadoThe Sociology of Fashion. A privileged point of view

Sociología de la moda, un punto de vista privilegiado
The Sociology of Fashion. A privileged point of view