English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The controversy on economic planning (1944-1945), between Roberto Simonsen and Eugenio Gudin, is a distinguished moment for the study of the history of economic ideas. Roberto Simonsen’s participation in this discussion can be revisited and read in an enriching way if a history-of-ideas perspective is adopted. This paper investigates the theoretical specificity that distinguishes Simonsen’s approach from Gudin’s, arguing that the former joins the debate by means of economic history. His approach was in tune with theoretical questions relevant at the end of World War II, which came to be debated by development economics in Brazil over the next decades. Placing Simonsen’s contribution in the historical context of the controversy opens new possibilities of reading this debate, which is essential for the construction of an economic thought in Brazil.

Redimensionando a contribuição de Roberto Simonsen à controvérsia do planejamento (1944-1945)